Dominik Szoboszlai’s industrious performance on Liverpool’s right wing provided stark contrast to Mohamed Salah’s recent displays, highlighting exactly why Arne Slot made the difficult decision to drop his star player. Where Salah had left defenders exposed and neglected defensive duties, Szoboszlai tracked back consistently and maintained positional discipline throughout.
The contrast wasn’t primarily about attacking quality—Salah obviously possesses greater offensive threat than Szoboszlai. Rather, it concerned work rate, defensive contribution, and team balance. Szoboszlai’s willingness to prioritize collective needs over individual glory demonstrated the mentality Slot requires from his wide players.
This comparison may seem unfair to Salah, whose career achievements and quality far exceed Szoboszlai’s. However, football’s evolution demands that even elite attackers contribute defensively. Players who won’t or can’t adapt to these modern requirements face marginalization regardless of attacking brilliance. Salah’s situation illustrates this harsh reality.
Szoboszlai’s performance demonstrated that Liverpool can function without Salah if necessary. They lose attacking threat but gain defensive stability and team balance. Whether this trade-off proves beneficial long-term depends on whether Liverpool can develop sufficient attacking threat from other sources to compensate for Salah’s absence.
For Hungarian supporters and Szoboszlai personally, this performance showcased his value beyond technical brilliance. His willingness to perform unglamorous defensive work, support teammates, and prioritize team success over individual statistics makes him valuable in modern football. While he may never possess Salah’s attacking genius, his industrious displays offer different value that current circumstances make more important. The contrast between approaches highlights football’s evolution toward collective organization over individual brilliance.