From the moment he was appointed, Peter Mandelson’s role as US ambassador was a ticking time bomb, destined to explode the second a journalist uncovered the full extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The government’s gamble was not that he was a safe choice, but a hope that the bomb’s fuse would never be lit.
The work of news outlets like Bloomberg and the Sun effectively lit that fuse, bringing to light the damning emails that the official vetting process had missed. The government’s defense—that this information was not public—reveals the core of its miscalculation: it assumed that the absence of public evidence meant no evidence existed.
This highlights the extreme precarity of appointing any public figure with a hidden, compromising past in the modern media landscape. Investigative journalism, powered by digital records and sources, makes it increasingly likely that such secrets will not stay buried forever. The government appointed a man knowing he was a risk, without appreciating the near-certainty of that risk being realized.
The resulting explosion has caused immense political damage. The scandal serves as a stark lesson that appointing a ticking time bomb to a sensitive post is not a calculated risk; it is an act of political recklessness with predictable and devastating consequences.